View previous topic :: View next topic |
was the moon landing real or staged |
It was real. |
|
79% |
[ 47 ] |
It was fake. |
|
6% |
[ 4 ] |
Im unsure. |
|
13% |
[ 8 ] |
|
Total Votes : 59 |
|
Author |
Message |
Mike 'Red Ocktober' Hense
Joined: 21 Sep 2001 Posts: 1262 Location: NY USA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spock... Spooock... did you hear what they just said...
Yes Captain... quite illogical...
Well, ya green blooded Vulcan... did ya look closely at some of those lil nodules... if i weren't a doctor, i would definitely say that some of em had more than a passing resemblence to our revered Captain...
live long and prosper!!!
--Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Torplexed
Joined: 25 Dec 2001 Posts: 1194 Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I Dream of Barbara Eden. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TLAM Strike
Joined: 30 Apr 2002 Posts: 4866 Location: Rochester, New York
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://stiivryan.home.mindspring.com/trektune2.htm
I've been listening to these recently and it makes TOS appear in a whole new light. 'Man to Man' is a must listen too considering the direction this thread is going... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DeepSix
Joined: 27 Mar 2005 Posts: 802 Location: DB22
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@Torplexed: Y'know, maybe this whole human cloning thing ain't so bad after all.... :hmm:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JJ
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 879 Location: Oulu, Finland
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, the times when women still looked like women instead of walking skeletons
:sunny: |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StdDev
Joined: 10 Jan 2002 Posts: 243 Location: SoCal
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
TLAM Strike wrote: | The only reason we went to the Moon is because we thought aliens looked like this back in the 1960's! |
But now we all know that aliens actually look like :
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Abraham
Joined: 31 Dec 2004 Posts: 3313 Location: Amsterdam Holland
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 11:05 am Post subject: First U.S. Moon landing real or fake? |
|
|
TLAM Strike wrote: | Yea the M-113 Creature had standards... |
M113 standards:
Date Introduced: 1960
Curb Weight (lbs): 20,310
Combat Weight (lbs): 23,520
Top Speed (mph): 37
Cruising Range (miles): 200
Engine Type: Gasoline
Engine HP: 209
HP/Tons: 17.8
Acceleration (0-20 mph) sec.: 12.0
Turning Radius (in): 276
Trench Crossing (in): 66
Slope (%): 60
Side Slope (%): 30
Braking (ft): 40
Ground Pressure (psi): 8.6
M113A3 standards:
Date Introduced: 1987
Curb Weight (lbs): 23,575
Combat Weight (lbs): 27,000
Top Speed (mph): 41
Cruising Range (miles): 300
Engine Type: Diesel
Engine HP: 275
HP/Tons: 20.4
Acceleration (0-20 mph) sec.: 7.8
Turning Radius: Pivot
Trench Crossing (in): 66
Slope (%): 60
Side Slope (%): 30
Braking (ft): 27
Ground Pressure (psi): 8.6 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Etienne
Joined: 10 Jan 2002 Posts: 641 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can't believe this thread has gone on for so long without anyone linking to Phil Blait's site. So here.
www.badastronomy.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DeepSix
Joined: 27 Mar 2005 Posts: 802 Location: DB22
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JJ wrote: | Oh, the times when women still looked like women instead of walking skeletons
:sunny: |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
August
Joined: 16 Apr 2005 Posts: 1296 Location: Rhode Island
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:27 pm Post subject: Re: First U.S. Moon landing real or fake? |
|
|
Abraham wrote: | TLAM Strike wrote: | Yea the M-113 Creature had standards... |
M113 standards:
Date Introduced: 1960
Curb Weight (lbs): 20,310
Combat Weight (lbs): 23,520
Top Speed (mph): 37
Cruising Range (miles): 200
Engine Type: Gasoline
Engine HP: 209
HP/Tons: 17.8
Acceleration (0-20 mph) sec.: 12.0
Turning Radius (in): 276
Trench Crossing (in): 66
Slope (%): 60
Side Slope (%): 30
Braking (ft): 40
Ground Pressure (psi): 8.6
M113A3 standards:
Date Introduced: 1987
Curb Weight (lbs): 23,575
Combat Weight (lbs): 27,000
Top Speed (mph): 41
Cruising Range (miles): 300
Engine Type: Diesel
Engine HP: 275
HP/Tons: 20.4
Acceleration (0-20 mph) sec.: 7.8
Turning Radius: Pivot
Trench Crossing (in): 66
Slope (%): 60
Side Slope (%): 30
Braking (ft): 27
Ground Pressure (psi): 8.6 |
I drove one for 3 years. You could easily get those things up to 50mph, especially on the convoy back to garrison. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Abraham
Joined: 31 Dec 2004 Posts: 3313 Location: Amsterdam Holland
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:38 pm Post subject: Re: First U.S. Moon landing real or fake? |
|
|
August wrote: | I drove one for 3 years. You could easily get those things up to 50mph, especially on the convoy back to garrison. |
An M113 or an M 113A3?
And don't tell me that you got tickets for speeding...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
August
Joined: 16 Apr 2005 Posts: 1296 Location: Rhode Island
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:53 pm Post subject: Re: First U.S. Moon landing real or fake? |
|
|
Abraham wrote: | August wrote: | I drove one for 3 years. You could easily get those things up to 50mph, especially on the convoy back to garrison. |
An M113 or an M 113A3?
And don't tell me that you got tickets for speeding...
|
Actually an M113A1 mostly although we did get some A2's late in my tour.
Not even the feared German Polizei tries to stop a convoy of tanks and APC's on it's way home from the field. The smell alone would incapacitate them... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sulikate
Joined: 29 May 2004 Posts: 610 Location: Goiania, Brazil
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Torplexed wrote: | The Avon Lady wrote: | I can't believe it's 2006 and people are still discussing this. |
Actually I think 2006 is part of the problem. It's been 34 years since a human being walked on the moon. I think people are starting to have a hard time believing we ever went. |
Thats right. I believe it is so extraordinary that people are having a hard time indeed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|