Forum Index
SUBSIM Forum Search

The Web's #1 BBS for all submarine and naval simulations!
[ SUBSIM Review ] [ SUBSIM STORE ]
Current Forum | Archives 2002-2003 |

Japanese Ships Which Should be in SHIV
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.     Forum Index -> Silent Hunter IV
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bookworm_020



Joined: 01 Aug 2005
Posts: 179
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Has any thought be given to what aircraft should be included? I know this could cause some debate, but it might need airing :hmm:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DeepSix



Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 802
Location: DB22

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 9:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My personal preference would be for U.S. subs only (including the 'S' boats and the older fleet boats like Argonaut) and not for playable Japanese subs. I say this because I think it's better for a game to do one thing really well than several things half-@ssed. If we assume that there will have to be a limit to what's included, my vote is to limit the playable inclusions to U.S. subs. That may not be a popular opinion, but that's my preference. I'm not trying to discount the significance of British or Dutch subs, just casting my view of where the limits should be.

As for aircraft - some models are already present in SH3 so there shouldn't be much problem there. Other Allied types should maybe include the F6F Hellcat, the F4U Corsair, the SBD Dauntless, the TBF/TBM torpedo bomber, the B-17... maybe some Brewster Buffalos in the SW Pacific. As for Japanese planes - I dunno.... Zeros, B5 Kates, D3 Vals, G4 Bettys or G3 Nells, and some search planes. I know I'm leaving some types out, but I would think the above are the more common types.

Last thought, though - it's anybody's guess. It depends on how much of the "periphery" is included in the game. In other words - how much the player will see of surface/carrier action, how much the player will be involved in observing air to ground attacks (e.g. lifeguard missions), etc.

Just some thoughts.


Last edited by DeepSix on Wed Apr 12, 2006 10:11 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DeepSix



Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 802
Location: DB22

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 9:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[Double post deleted]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Torplexed



Joined: 25 Dec 2001
Posts: 1194
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 9:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

All this speculation about Japanese ships, planes and possibly having a grandstand seat on a carrier battle made me load up UbiSoft's Pacific Fighters again just to get a periscope level look at some Japanese 3-D ship models. Imagine this baby coming into view in your periscope on a fine morning in June 1942..... Wink

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DeepSix



Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 802
Location: DB22

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 10:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Man battle stations!!! Mr. O'Kane! Give me a solution! Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Torplexed



Joined: 25 Dec 2001
Posts: 1194
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hee..hee. My sentiments exactly DeepSix!

Now if Japanese sub control is included here's your Long Lance ticket to immortality. Ping

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bookworm_020



Joined: 01 Aug 2005
Posts: 179
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I love to get me hands on a long lance torpedo Thumbs Up If there was a mod to add them to my XXI I would be in heaven, as well as a lot of mechant crews! Rock
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DeepSix



Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 802
Location: DB22

PostPosted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hate to burst the bubble, because the "Long Lance" was indeed an excellent torpedo, but I think it was only used in surface ships. The submarine torpedo was the Type 95. Both models were driven by compressed oxygen (hydrogen peroxide) and travelled at 45-50 knots, IIRC.

But, heck yeah, Long Lances could ruin anybody's day. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SilentOtto



Joined: 27 Mar 2002
Posts: 19

PostPosted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I recall reading the long lance was 23" and used by aircraft mostly... the 21" wich fitted german subs and was used by Monsun boats was inferior quality...

Quote:
Imagine this baby coming into view in your periscope on a fine morning in June 1942.....


Yea, and sure most of my Marks would be duds!!! Grrrr!!![/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Wulfmann



Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 507
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 11:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not one Jap sub had the LL 24inch fish. Every warship built from 1925 on had 24 inch (how did you arrive at 23inch???) except the small Tomozuru (650ton) and Otori (95otons) torpedo boats.

With all the models in this game I do not see making a single Jap boat and one less US sub as anything but a big increase in interest, ergo sales and profits.
I would prefer less but netter sub models and would be happy with an S Boat and then any common later Gato type and one fine I-Boat; the B1 (I-15) class would be my choice because it could start the war and end in it and was a decent boat.

The Jap boats looked good on paper but were poor to maneuver, slow to dive and weak hulled compared with US and German subs.
If done accurately they would sink easily to minor depth charge attacks that US and German subs would survive.
Wulfmann
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AG124



Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 770
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What about merchant ships? If the US is primarily the primary side, then a good variety of Japanese merchants will be needed. Yep They should be smaller than in the Atlantic too, as Japanese merchant vessels seemed to have a tendency to be smaller than their Atlantic counterparts. I think we really need at least:

Four classes of tankers. One very small class around 1,000 GRT, one medium class (~5,000 GRT), one large-medium class (~7,000 GRT) and one rare and very large class (10,000+ GRT). If Whale Factories are to be classified as tankers, then a 17-19,000 GRT one will do fine as well.

Four classes of freighter. One under 1,000 GRT, two between 2,000 and 5,000 GRT, and one around 7,500 GRT.

Three types of passenger vessels. One small passenger/cargo combination (~3,000 GRT), one transport (5-6,000 GRT), and one larger passenger liner (~15,000 GRT).

Several types of auxiliaries, including seaplane carriers, sub depots, and destroyer tenders.

At least three or four types of coastal crafts - sampans, regular fishing boats, tugboats, etc.

As someone else said, the SHIV dev team should check out this thread and others, as advice from their consumer base could prove to be at least a little helpful. Yep
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
AG124



Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 770
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some pictures of Japanese auxiliaries, similar to regular merchants:







Strange looking tanker Surprised :







This tanker looks more like a light cruiser Razz :



So does this one:











I could post more, including some strange-looking landing craft, but these will be enough. It should be noted that a lot of these auxiliaries are larger than most of their mercantile counterparts, especially the tankers (the ones pictured are mainly over 14,000 GRT).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
DeepSix



Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 802
Location: DB22

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That all sounds good to me. Yep I think the converted whale factories should go in the tanker category as well.

(Were any of them used for other purposes? I'm thinking they were all used as tankers.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AG124



Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 770
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some whale factories were indeed converted to tankers. Yep And some tankers were converted to whale factories. Cool

I hope SHIII and SHIV ships will be interchangeable. It would help if they could be combined, and would give us a larger roster. :hmm:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ssn756



Joined: 17 Apr 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:10 pm    Post subject: AG124's awesome pictures Reply with quote

In case anyone is curious :

#1 is the Mamiya, a refrigerated stores ship (17,500 tons).

#2 is the Soya, an ammunition ship (3,800 tons).

#3 is the Chogei, a submarine tender (8,600 tons).

#4 is the Akashi, a repair ship (10,500 tons).

#5 & #6 are Shiretoko class oilers (15,450 tons).

#7 is the Sunosaki, an aviation gasoline tanker (4,700 tons).

#8 is the Tsurigisaki, a submarine tender (13,000 tons). All of you would know her better as the light carrier Shoho. This is what she looked like before conversion.

#9 & #10 are armed merchant cruisers - either Aikoku Maru, Hokoku Maru, or Gokoku Maru (10,438 tons).

#11 is a seaplane tender of the Kamikawa Maru type (6,853 - 8,407 tons)

#12 is labeled Shinshu Maru. The real Shinshu Maru was a landing ship that looks nothing like the ship in the drawing. The closest to an identification that I can make is a hospital ship, except for the obvious gun mounts. The silhouettes are very close though.

Does anybody have any other ship pictures?

If you would like me to try to ID them, please post them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.     Forum Index -> Silent Hunter IV All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group