| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Kapitan
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 5385
Location: essex england also st petersburg russia
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:27 am Post subject: |
 |
|
K129 was not a golf 2 submarine infact she was a golf I
moscow formaly denies K129 golf exists dr kravan notes on missile in the sail of the sub missing noting that this is golf I
golf II has a sort of hump like a normal SSBN after its sail with K129 this is not the case
of all the golfs most were converted K129 was not and so was a few others |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Nemo
Joined: 10 Jan 2002
Posts: 191
Location: London, England
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kapitain wrote: | | K129 was not a golf 2 submarine infact she was a golf I |
Strange, the author of the book says it was a Golf II but the reason it tried to fire a missile on the surface was because it was trying to imitate a Chinese Golf I so that China got the blame for flattening Hawaii. However if true, this ploy would have failed because SOSUS had already picked up the K-129 and classified it as a Golf II sub. Perhaps the author is talking a load of tosh anyway and it was a Golf I.
Nemo |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kapitan
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 5385
Location: essex england also st petersburg russia
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| time the K129 went down golf II was under going tesing it took years before they even raise part of K129 and when crevan said missile missing in the tube in the sail that immediatly gives it awway as a golf I |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
