View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Deathblow
Joined: 11 Sep 2005 Posts: 392
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The development team should look at AI sub behavior in the littorals. More often than not a sub that is torp evading in waters less than 600ft deep will bottom out. None are managing their depth correctly and all will eventually become stuck to the bottom. This was happening even before the 1.03beta patch so its most likely a doctrine error than anything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bubblehd647
Joined: 27 Dec 2005 Posts: 18 Location: Brandon, FL
|
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sonar interface improvement:
IIRC, on the real BQQ-5 passive BB displays, in addition to the stern marker that is currently modeled, there is also a ships head marker. Right now I see a marker at the top of the stern marker that I THINK is supposed to really be this indicator. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HydroShok
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
from what i can tell from experimenting with the map editor, the bottom type is extremely important in 1.03b. If its rock, you'll get those huge detection ranges, like several miles. If its mud, it cuts it in half approx. If its a sand bottom, sonobouys on active will hardly even work up to mile. Theres a thread in here that talks about sonobouys only working 500-750 yards away and it happens with a sand or mud bottom, especially if the sub is going less than 5 knots. I kinda wish you could see in game what type of bottom there is, because it affects the sonobouys so much.
I'd like to see another controllable surface ship so both teams wont have identical ships online, which can be confusing without show allies. And another type of controllable surface ship that complements the FFG.
An air to air weapon would be usefull for those rare moments online when theres nothing but air players left.
Tone down the noise on the non controllable AI subs. They are like an underwater rock concert as it is now. That and they're deaf as all. I know the lwami mod addresses this.
I kinda like launching stuff from above with p3. the ciws on the FFG will engage falling torpedoes (im pretty sure). if u do max speed and altitude, you can launch a bouy 12 miles ahead, i though it was kewl. Torp lead is not nearly as much.
i dont like the tma on paper that the ffg has. GB2 sub style please.
My joystick isn't fancy enough to work the gas correctly in the chopper. I wish i could just click digital buttons to notch the gas up and down slightly, and hold the gas in its place when im not doing anything with it. Right now it requires constant attention, when I'm looking or a "cruise control". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sub Sailor
Joined: 14 Sep 2002 Posts: 295 Location: Orofino, Idaho
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 9:56 am Post subject: Air Banks |
|
|
Is it possible to have the air banks at 100 % at the start of the mission?
Ron Banks MMCM(SS), USN(Ret) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RedDevilCG
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is the Type-40 torpedo dropped from the SS-N-27 supposed to be able to sinke ships? It says its asw only...
I've had them lock onto, track, and sink merchants! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wim Libaers
Joined: 21 Sep 2001 Posts: 396 Location: Flanders
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ASW only in this game seems to mean that it can only be targeted on contacts that are classified as subs. But once it's in the water, it can hunt anything it wants. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Deathblow
Joined: 11 Sep 2005 Posts: 392
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:24 pm Post subject: The MAD parade |
|
|
I'm venting a pet peeve
Whenever AI ASW helos and P3 get a mad contact on a player sub, all they do is just circle around it repeatedly getting mads, over, and over and over again. Once they have a MAD contact they never loose it and continue to circle forever, most of the time resulting in 3-4 planes/helos all doing a goofy looking dance overhead of the sub below. And they rarely ever attack, they just circle over and over and over again for what can last for hours.
Bad AI programming? Probably. Solution? Not sure, but something to address this aberant behavior would be nice. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaHuJa
Joined: 10 Jan 2002 Posts: 447 Location: 59.96156N 11.02255E
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:29 am Post subject: Re: The MAD parade |
|
|
Deathblow wrote: | Solution? Not sure, but something to address this aberant behavior would be nice. |
I suspect the problem is that once they have a mad contact, they're inclined to keep it, but mad does not classify the contact. If they dropped a (passive) buoy automatically, upon getting that mad contact, it might help. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
OneShot
Joined: 24 Mar 2005 Posts: 704 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That sounds like something a new or modified doctrine might easily fix ... Sort of, if MAD then drop Passive Buoy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Amizaur
Joined: 22 Nov 2002 Posts: 549 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Could changing value of PreenableCourse variable inside doctrine also update the connected Heading value displayed on sub torpedo control screen ? Please please please, I'm asking very much for this if it's possible !!! Thanks in advance |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaHuJa
Joined: 10 Jan 2002 Posts: 447 Location: 59.96156N 11.02255E
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oneshot, once you have a mechanism not to drop one each frame the game proceeeds, you have only one problem left: How do you drop a buoy from the doctrines? "Fire dicass deep" ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LuftWolf
Joined: 09 May 2005 Posts: 1872 Location: Free New York
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are no doctrine level commands to drop buoys that I am aware of.
That kind of behavior for air platforms is coded in the AI engine.
In general, submarine behavior is more or less completely doctrine controlled, ships are a mix of doctrine and engine, and aircraft are mostly controlled by the engine.
Of course, there may be doctrine level commands for ships and aircraft that are not currently being used, but I am not aware of this being the case in this situation. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Deathblow
Joined: 11 Sep 2005 Posts: 392
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LuftWolf wrote: | That kind of behavior for air platforms is coded in the AI engine. |
:dead: ..... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaHuJa
Joined: 10 Jan 2002 Posts: 447 Location: 59.96156N 11.02255E
|
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Savegames.... Not all relevant information for a platform is saved. As one example, a dead platform that hasn't yet been removed from the game when the game is saved, will never disappear if the game is reloaded.
(Not that I think they *should* be removed, but that's another case.) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dr.Sid
Joined: 17 May 2005 Posts: 205
|
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wakehomers could have setting 'heading after enable' .. so one cac easily shoot them from target's front hemisphere. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|