View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
TLAM Strike
Joined: 30 Apr 2002 Posts: 4866 Location: Rochester, New York
|
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2004 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaHuJa
Joined: 10 Jan 2002 Posts: 447 Location: 59.96156N 11.02255E
|
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2004 1:47 pm Post subject: my wish... |
|
|
I'd like a 'virtual unit' added, playable, when played it would give you a "fleet command" type interface. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mozzie
Joined: 15 Jul 2004 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
lokust wrote: | A Nimitz |
Although it's a bit beyond DW, having a player controled carrier and being able to launch player controled aircraft from it woul be soooo coool. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TLAM Strike
Joined: 30 Apr 2002 Posts: 4866 Location: Rochester, New York
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 5:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well I think I worked out a good list of what should be in any add-on. IF the add-on were to be as big as the game (Two Disks) but minus the Source Code, Sounds and extra Graphics (Basicly just new stations, player craft grapics, and voices) SA might be able to get a away with this:
Blue:
Collins or Type 212* (Or Barbel if we want to go with something from the USA!)
Spruance+
Burke+
MR-2 Nimrod*
Type 42 +
Type 22+
Type 23*
Trafalger*
Lynx*
Oberon or Upholder*
OPFOR:
Bear-F/May*
Helix*
Kirvak*
Udaloy+
Sovermnny +
Oscar+
Zhi-9A Haitun*
* Denotes a counterballance for an existing platform
+ Denotes a counterballance for a new platform
I think this ballances all the sides (With UK added and PLAN ballanced somewhat) and adds some new dynamics. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Heppuli
Joined: 05 Nov 2004 Posts: 31 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't try to mirror them all! :down:
If you mirror them, it gets too boring, it would be just same what platform you play.
Oh, somebody tried to hack me from Korea JUST now!
Well, he was no match for my firewall!
Back to topic, is Seawolf, 668 and Akula completely balanced and mirrored? NO!
So don't mirror them, it is more interesting when there is no mirroring and such.
Imagine:
There is a sub sim, with 3 different controllable subs.
Sub 1 characterics:
(diesel) Silent, got 4 tubes and 10 weapon rack, no VLS or missiles
Sub 2:
(nuclear) Got 8 tubes, 14 rack, 8 VLS tubes, looks cool (?), and 6 external CM tubes.
Sub 3:
(diesel) VERY silent, got no VLS, 4 tubes, 6 rack, no towed array and can ground.
OR would this be better:
Sub 1:
(nuclear) Got 8 tubes (4 external), 18 rack, 12 VLS and 8 external CM tubes.
Sub 2:
(nuclear) Got 8 tubes (4 external), 18 rack, 12 VLS and 8 external CM tubes.
Sub 3:
(nuclear) Got 8 tubes (4 external), 18 rack, 12 VLS and 8 external CM tubes.
I hope this makes you guys think something. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TLAM Strike
Joined: 30 Apr 2002 Posts: 4866 Location: Rochester, New York
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They are not Mirrored they are just balancing the forces so each side has atleast one of each type of platform. A flight sim might have a MiG 29 to ballance out a F-15 but they are not the same and play very diffrently.
Look at thease Examples. The Type 22 (Duke Class) which I ment to be a counter of the OHP is armed with 8 Harpoons (Same # as OHP but in its own launcher) 1 VLS system for the Seawolf SAM (NOT what the OHP has) has 8 torpedoes (while the OHP has 6), and has a bigger gun.
The Trafalger has 5 tubes against the LA's 4 No VLS but has 2/3 diffirent torpedoes and diffrent CM launchers.
The weapons and sensors on each platform are quite diffrent, I just want each side to have the same types of ships. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Heppuli
Joined: 05 Nov 2004 Posts: 31 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2004 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Aah, NOW I understand! :know: |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|