View previous topic :: View next topic |
Which rudder configuration is best? |
Traditional Crucifrom |
|
88% |
[ 8 ] |
Increasing popular X configuration |
|
11% |
[ 1 ] |
|
Total Votes : 9 |
|
Author |
Message |
Deathblow
Joined: 11 Sep 2005 Posts: 392
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
goldorak
Joined: 21 Apr 2005 Posts: 393 Location: Milano,Italy
|
Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would answer if I knew the differences in performance between the two types of ruder.
But based on a purely estetic point of view I choose cruciform configuration. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wildcat
Joined: 10 Jan 2002 Posts: 438
|
Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would choose the simple old design. There's less to go wrong, and less to fix if something really does go wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Deathblow
Joined: 11 Sep 2005 Posts: 392
|
Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
goldorak wrote: | I would answer if I knew the differences in performance between the two types of ruder.
But based on a purely estetic point of view I choose cruciform configuration. |
There's definantly some collness to the X form. Its a sexy design.
To sum up the performance differences in a quick nutshell, one could basically say that the X form produces more turning power and thus improved manueverability, but is mechnically more complicated and operationally more complicated. A cruciform gets less turning power, but is simpler.
Cruciforms are pretty inuitive to operate, just at a glance, and in the situation where a computer goes down, or for whatever other reason, the ship needs to be steered manually on manual control it can be done pretty successfully. The X form on the other hand, is more complicated, and in the event of a systems failure, would be a nightmare to control.
One could go into more detail about the why's and ifs of each design but that about sums it up. I chose the cruciform.
Oh, and I'm not sure how easy it is to stream a tow array through an X form rudder... :hmm: |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|