View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Rompedor
Joined: 30 Apr 2002 Posts: 27 Location: Spain
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:55 pm Post subject: "SurfAtkSub" does not exist in doctrines |
|
|
In the Doctrine of SCX lack the file “SurfAtkSub” because in “SurfAvoidSub” is the following orders :
IF ( TgtID $= "HOSTILE" ) OR ( TgtSource $= "Active Intercept" ) THEN {
IF NOT ( Order $= "Track" ) AND NOT ( TgtID $= "FRIEND" ) THEN {
DebugOut "Switching from Avoid to Attack"
SetTactic "SurfAtkSub"
} ELSE {
;
The file “SurfAtkSub” does not exist in directory of doctrines. Then the surface platforms does not attack to the subs. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Konovalov
Joined: 14 Sep 2002 Posts: 2438 Location: High Wycombe, United Kingdom.
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Am I missing something because I have had the SCX series since it's release and have been harassed, attacked and on occasion sunk by a skimmer. So in my experience surface vessels do attack subs. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scion
Joined: 31 May 2001 Posts: 1552 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Its not broken -- DON'T FIX IT |
|
Back to top |
|
|
XabbaRus
Joined: 21 Sep 2001 Posts: 6949
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IIRC Thomas took it out as it was redundent due to built in doctrine that is hardcoded. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Thomasew
Joined: 21 Sep 2001 Posts: 2737 Location: Bluewater Bay, South Africa
|
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Rompedor
The Doctrine you refer to, .. and the Doctrine you found it in .. i.e. SurfAvoidSub ... are not used by SCX.
I was working on some stuff for the Surface Ships, .. but, it was all still in testing.
The 'SurfAvoidSub' doctrine was accidently zipped up with the other SCX Doctrines, Database & models etc..
I'll look at the Surface stuff again, .. once Dangerous Waters is released ..
My apologies for the confusion ...
Cheers
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NefariousKoel
Joined: 22 Nov 2002 Posts: 1457 Location: KCMO
|
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are a number of them which weren't implemented.. such as "radiotransmit" or whatever.
Jamie said few of them never got fully implemented and it was just a bonus that we got to deal with them. I'm not bitchin either. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|